In an unusual twist, both staunch opponents of marijuana and advocates for its legalization are urging Alabama Governor Kay Ivey to veto new legislation concerning psychoactive cannabinoids, including Delta 8. The proposed House Bill 445 (HB445), introduced by State Representative Andy Whitt (R-Harvest), aims to empower the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Board to regulate all hemp-derived products.
If enacted, this bill would require manufacturers, wholesale distributors, and retailers of consumable hemp products to obtain licenses. Additionally, it sets the minimum age for purchasing these products at 21 years and restricts sales to locations such as existing liquor stores that minors cannot access. The legislation also stipulates labeling and testing requirements, limits THC content in consumable hemp products to 10 milligrams, and introduces an excise tax. Notably, the bill prohibits all vape products and hemp flowers infused with various cannabinoids.
The legislation has faced strong opposition from shop owners, sellers, and distributors who fear it could jeopardize their businesses due to increased government oversight and restrictions. Despite their objections, HB445 passed through the House and Senate after revisions and is now awaiting Ivey’s approval.
On the other side, groups opposed to marijuana legalization, including the Eagle Forum of Alabama, ALCAP, and API, have criticized the bill for endorsing the sale of what they consider a harmful drug, particularly for children. In a rare moment of agreement, both sides are calling on Ivey to reject the bill. API stated, “Marijuana is a Schedule 1 drug. API stands opposed to the state condoning and taxing the illegal drug use of its citizens. If this bill is signed, the real losers will be the citizens of Alabama dealing with the aftermath of drugs being sold legally statewide in grocery stores and other outlets.”
An online petition against HB445 has garnered over 1,500 signatures within a week, highlighting concerns that the bill could disproportionately impact marginalized communities. The petition points out that the legislation might undermine civil rights protections and exacerbate challenges for vulnerable populations. It argues, “Urging a veto of HB445 is not just about preventing potential harms but also about steering our state towards a more progressive, fair, and inclusive future.”
As the situation unfolds, Ivey’s decision on HB445 could significantly influence the regulation of hemp products in Alabama and the broader landscape of cannabis legislation in the state.
English 
Spanish 
German 
Czech