SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — A proposed bill aimed at preventing Illinois law enforcement from conducting vehicle searches solely based on the odor of cannabis has progressed to the House floor. However, the bill faces considerable opposition from police organizations, Republican lawmakers, and some moderate Democrats.
In September, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that police do not have probable cause to search vehicles if they detect burnt cannabis odor. Conversely, a December ruling established that the smell of raw cannabis does provide probable cause for searches.
State Representative Curtis Tarver (D-Chicago) emphasized the need for clarity between existing laws regarding cannabis possession in vehicles. ‘Consistency between the Vehicle Code and Regulation Act is essential so users of cannabis know how to comply without breaking the law, and police officers know when they can enforce the laws,’ he stated.
Senate Bill 42 proposes to eliminate requirements for odorless packaging while maintaining that cannabis must be stored in secure, child-resistant containers. Under this bill, police would be prohibited from stopping or searching vehicles driven by individuals aged 21 and older based solely on the smell of cannabis.
Rep. Dennis Tipsword (R-Metamora) expressed concerns about the implications of the bill, noting that while he cannot currently search a vehicle based on odor alone, the presence of cannabis could pose a risk if it is not securely packaged. ‘If I can smell it, it’s probably not in a child-resistant container,’ he remarked.
House GOP leaders have voiced worries that the bill could inadvertently facilitate drug trafficking in Illinois. Law enforcement officials asserted that while they understand the sponsors’ intentions, further discussions are necessary to ensure public safety. Jim Kaitschuk, Executive Director of the Illinois Sheriffs Association, highlighted the potential risks for individuals under the age of 21, who are prohibited from possessing cannabis.
The legislation narrowly passed out of the House Judiciary-Criminal Committee with an 8-6 vote. Tarver indicated he would hold the bill for further review and discussions with stakeholders. The bill previously received approval in the Senate with a 33-20 vote. Any amendments to the bill would need to be finalized before the legislative session concludes on May 31.
English 
Spanish 
German 
Czech