Matthew Schweich, a leading advocate for cannabis legalization, is leaving the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) after a decade of significant contributions to state-level legalization efforts. Schweich has been instrumental in campaigns across various states, from Massachusetts to Utah, advocating for both medical and recreational cannabis measures. Under his guidance, MPP has become a prominent force in advancing cannabis reform nationwide.
Despite widespread public support for cannabis legalization, Schweich emphasizes that pushing these initiatives through ballot measures is a complex endeavor. Although many states have legalized cannabis, he has observed a troubling trend of complacency among advocates. He points out that the grassroots momentum that once energized reform efforts has diminished, jeopardizing future initiatives as various states attempt to limit voters’ ability to enact changes through direct democracy.
Schweich’s departure comes at a pivotal moment, as he transitions to a project aimed at preserving the citizen initiative process. He expressed concerns that the diminishing focus on state-level activism could lead to a prolonged disconnection between state and federal cannabis policies. “We need to finish this fight. We haven’t finished it yet,” he stated in an interview with Marijuana Moment.
During his tenure, Schweich served as an interim executive director at MPP, where he played a key role in leveraging the organization’s institutional knowledge to tailor cannabis policy strategies across different states. He recognized the importance of adapting successful tactics from previous campaigns while respecting local sentiments and dynamics. MPP has been active for 30 years, and Schweich believes its experience and adaptability are vital to maintaining progress in the cannabis reform movement.
Looking ahead, Schweich expressed concerns that the current political climate could hinder further reform efforts. While some states have achieved significant victories in legalizing cannabis, he worries that advocates may not feel a sense of urgency to continue fighting for reform. The focus on other pressing political issues may divert attention from cannabis legalization, which could stall momentum.
Recent attacks on the citizen initiative process in various states have also alarmed Schweich. He has witnessed firsthand how efforts to restrict voter initiatives threaten the ability of citizens to enact policies when their elected officials fail to respond. In South Dakota, a successful cannabis legalization measure was overturned by the state Supreme Court, highlighting the vulnerability of citizen-led initiatives.
Schweich believes that these attacks on the initiative process reflect a broader trend of diminishing respect for electoral outcomes. Politicians increasingly question the validity of ballot measures, undermining the democratic principle that voters should have the final say on important issues. He noted that this shift in attitudes has coincided with a general erosion of political norms in the United States.
With the cannabis industry facing scrutiny over its lack of financial support for reform initiatives, Schweich highlighted the challenges of fundraising in this evolving landscape. Early on, philanthropic contributions fueled the movement, but as a legal cannabis industry has emerged, there has been a shift in funding responsibility. Many in the industry believe they should no longer rely on philanthropists, while companies often hesitate to invest in reform efforts, fearing they will bear the costs alone.
Despite these challenges, Schweich remains optimistic about the potential for federal cannabis reform, especially with a second Trump administration on the horizon. He noted that Trump has previously supported cannabis initiatives and believes that there is still an opportunity for significant progress at the federal level. However, he stresses that sustained pressure from state-level advocacy is critical to achieving lasting change.
As Schweich transitions to his new role, he hopes to inspire renewed commitment to state-level activism in the fight for cannabis reform, emphasizing that the path to federal legalization hinges on maintaining momentum at the state level.
English 
Spanish 
German 
Czech